Hi Alison, et al.,

I accept there is often no perfect solution.   I was primarily registering my 
preference/vote in case other latecomers want to chime in.

My main reason for preferring 'flux' is internal CF consistency (which is 
especially important if we hope of one day transitioning to a 
vocabulary/grammar system).  A minor worry is that 'irradiance' may get 
confused with 'spherical_irradiance'.

In summary, I think 'irradiance' is acceptable, but 'flux' is preferable.

Best wishes,

      Philip

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Cameron-Smith, p...@llnl.gov, CliMA Group Leader, Lawrence Livermore 
Nat. Lab.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


From: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk [mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 9:27 AM
To: Cameron-smith, Philip; jbi...@cicsnc.org; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu; 
odele.codding...@lasp.colorado.edu; judith.l...@nrl.navy.mil; 
peter.pilews...@lasp.colorado.edu
Cc: daniel.wun...@noaa.gov
Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] New standard name requests for TSI and SSI

Dear Philip,

As I'm sure you will have seen, this point has caused a lot of discussion and 
gave rise to Jonathan's separate question about whether we should change all 
'flux' names to 'flux_density'. I note that you voted 'no' to that change, and 
there does seem to be an emerging majority for that view.

As far as these particular names are concerned, using 'irradiance' is the 
compromise we arrived at as the proposers really weren't happy with using 
'flux'. It is true that we haven't managed to achieve complete consistency with 
existing names, but we have sometimes in the past allowed community specific 
names into the table to make them more recognizable to those most likely to use 
them (the recently agreed name of apparent_oxygen_utilization is an example of 
this). 'Irradiance' is a term that already appears in some standard names (as 
spherical_irradiance) and in the definitions of all flux quantities. 
Conversely, 'flux' will appear in the definitions of the TSI and SSI names. 
Thus I continue to support
solar_irradiance and solar_irradiance_per_unit_wavelength as the best option 
for compromise and agreement on these quantities.

Best wishes,
Alison

------
Alison Pamment                                 Tel: +44 1235 778065
Centre for Environmental Data Analysis         Email: 
alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:j.a.pamm...@rl.ac.uk>
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.


From: Cameron-smith, Philip [mailto:cameronsmi...@llnl.gov]
Sent: 06 June 2015 03:18
To: Jim Biard; Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,RALSP); 
cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>; 
odele.codding...@lasp.colorado.edu<mailto:odele.codding...@lasp.colorado.edu>; 
judith.l...@nrl.navy.mil<mailto:judith.l...@nrl.navy.mil>; 
peter.pilews...@lasp.colorado.edu<mailto:peter.pilews...@lasp.colorado.edu>
Cc: daniel.wun...@noaa.gov<mailto:daniel.wun...@noaa.gov>
Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] New standard name requests for TSI and SSI

Hi All,

Even though I personally have one foot in the radiation camp and like 
irradiance, I prefer that CF go with 'flux' rather than 'irradiance' in order 
to be consistent with all of the existing radiative flux std_names.  Hence, my 
vote is for:


solar_flux   (W m-2)


solar_flux_per_unit_wavelength  (W m-2 m-1)

Best wishes,

      Philip


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Cameron-Smith, p...@llnl.gov<mailto:p...@llnl.gov>, CliMA Group Leader, 
Lawrence Livermore Nat. Lab.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Jim 
Biard
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 7:39 AM
To: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>; 
cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>; 
odele.codding...@lasp.colorado.edu<mailto:odele.codding...@lasp.colorado.edu>; 
judith.l...@nrl.navy.mil<mailto:judith.l...@nrl.navy.mil>; 
peter.pilews...@lasp.colorado.edu<mailto:peter.pilews...@lasp.colorado.edu>
Cc: daniel.wun...@noaa.gov<mailto:daniel.wun...@noaa.gov>
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] New standard name requests for TSI and SSI

Looks great to me! Thanks for all the hard work!
On 6/4/15 10:11 AM, alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk> 
wrote:

Dear All,



I agree with Jonathan's recent summary of the discussion and support the 
standard names as suggested by Jim and Jonathan. Odele, Peter and Judith, the 
proposers, have all previously indicated that this would be an acceptable 
solution, so I think we now have consensus on the names. Based on the 
discussion in this thread and our usual wording for standard name definitions I 
suggest that the following be added to the standard name table:



solar_irradiance (W m-2)

'The quantity with standard name solar_irradiance, often called Total Solar 
Irradiance (TSI), is radiation from the sun integrated over the whole 
electromagnetic spectrum and over the entire solar disk. The quantity applies 
outside the atmosphere, by default at a distance of one astronomical unit from 
the Sun, but a coordinate or scalar coordinate variable of distance_from_sun 
can be used to specify a value other than the default. "Irradiance" means the 
power per unit area (called radiative flux in other standard names), the area 
being normal to the direction of flow of the radiant energy.'



solar_irradiance_per_unit_wavelength (W m-2 m-1)

'The quantity with standard name solar_irradiance_per_unit_wavelength, often 
called Solar Spectral Irradiance (SSI), is the radiation from the sun as a 
function of wavelength integrated over the entire solar disk. A coordinate 
variable for radiation wavelength should be given the standard name 
radiation_wavelength. The quantity applies outside the atmosphere, by default 
at a distance of one astronomical unit from the Sun, but a coordinate or scalar 
coordinate variable of distance_from_sun can be used to specify a value other 
than the default. "Irradiance" means the power per unit area (called radiative 
flux in other standard names), the area being normal to the direction of flow 
of the radiant energy. '



distance_from_sun (m)

The distance from the sun to the point of observation.



Are there any further comments on these names?



Best wishes,

Alison



------

Alison Pamment                                 Tel: +44 1235 778065

NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data Archival    Email: 
alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>

STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

R25, 2.22

Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.



-----Original Message-----

From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf

Of Jonathan Gregory

Sent: 01 June 2015 17:39

To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>

Cc: 
odele.codding...@lasp.colorado.edu<mailto:odele.codding...@lasp.colorado.edu>

Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] New standard name requests for TSI and SSI



Dear all



Few opinions still have been given about whether we should change flux to

flux_density in standard names, and those few are a majority against doing

so.

Since the proposers aren't happy with "flux" for "irradiance" in W m-2, I

think the best compromise is



solar_irradiance (W m-2)

solar_irradiance_per_unit_wavelength (W m-3)



where the definition should note that "irradiance" means the power per

unit

area (called radiative flux in other standard names), the area being normal

to a vector from the Sun to the Earth, and the quantity applies outside

the atmosphere, by default at a distance of one astronomical unit from the

Sun, but a coordinate or scalar coordinate variable of distance_from_sun can

be specified to replace the default.



distance_from_sun (m)



is therefore also required as a new standard name.



Best wishes



Jonathan

_______________________________________________

CF-metadata mailing list

CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>

http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

_______________________________________________

CF-metadata mailing list

CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>

http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

--
[CICS-NC]<http://www.cicsnc.org/>Visit us on
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cicsnc>

Jim Biard
Research Scholar
Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites NC <http://cicsnc.org/>
North Carolina State University <http://ncsu.edu/>
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information <http://ncdc.noaa.gov/>
formerly NOAA's National Climatic Data Center
151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801
e: jbi...@cicsnc.org<mailto:jbi...@cicsnc.org>
o: +1 828 271 4900

Connect with us on Facebook for 
climate<https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIclimate> and ocean and 
geophysics<https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIoceangeo> information, and follow 
us on Twitter at @NOAANCEIclimate<https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIclimate> and 
@NOAANCEIocngeo<https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIocngeo>.


_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to