Dear Bob After that proposal was agreed, we had some further discussions concerning the relationship of gridspec and ugrid and how they could be made more similar. As you say, gridspec hasn't been implemented into CF, and since quite a lot of time has passed, I think the proposal should be reconsidered as a change after 1.7 is built (which will be soon, I hope). I wonder what Balaji thinks.
Best wishes Jonathan ----- Forwarded message from Robert Oehmke <robert.oeh...@noaa.gov> ----- > Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 17:34:13 -0700 > From: Robert Oehmke <robert.oeh...@noaa.gov> > To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > CC: bal...@princeton.edu > Subject: [CF-metadata] Reference for GRIDSPEC? > X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) > > Hi, > > In ESMF we support a subset of the GRIDSPEC convention for creating grids, > generating regridding weights, etc. In our reference manual we pointed to a > wiki hosted by the company Tech-X that described the CF proposal for > GRIDSPEC. (This was also the place to which the CF Metadata Trac proposal for > GRIDSPEC pointed.) Now this wiki appears to be gone. I also couldn?t find a > description of GRIDSPEC in the current (1.6) or upcoming (1.7) conventions > documents. Should we switch back to pointing to the original document > (http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/~vb/gridstd/gridstd.html), or is there a better > place to reference for a description? > > Thanks, > > - Bob Oehmke > _______________________________________________ > CF-metadata mailing list > CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata ----- End forwarded message ----- _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
