Dear all, My proposal for a new standard name "*sea_binary**_mask*" hasn't raised much discussion. Is there a chance it could be included in the next table update?
Regards, Elodie On 11/07/2017 09:55, Elodie Fernandez wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to suggest the addition of a new standard_name to > describe land-sea masks. A standard_name already exists: > land_binary_mask ( > X_binary_mask has 1 where condition X is met, 0 elsewhere. 1 = land, 0 > = sea.). But in the ocean modelling community, we have already > existing files describing those masks, but from an "ocean point of > view", so 1 is for sea and 0 is for land points. > So I would like to request the addition of the standard_name > "*sea_binary**_mask*", > with definition "X_binary_mask has 1 where condition X is met, 0 > elsewhere. 1 = sea, 0 = land" and unit "1". > > Best regards, > Elodie > > Click here > <https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/cuuFVDQY8CXGX2PQPOmvUkISMVDCv96oI0uMwjWeGArdW6mhGRxXYtOzoDUNY3q8PqmUFQIrCxnNfN+NdwfdFw==> > to report this email as spam. > > > > _______________________________________________ > CF-metadata mailing list > CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
_______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
