Dear all, My proposal from July 11th for a new standard name "*sea_binary**_mask*" hasn't raised much discussion. Is there a chance it could be included in the next table update?
Regards, Elodie On 23/08/2017 11:07, Elodie Fernandez wrote: > Dear all, > > My proposal for a new standard name "*sea_binary**_mask*" hasn't > raised much discussion. Is there a chance it could be included in the > next table update? > > Regards, > Elodie > > On 11/07/2017 09:55, Elodie Fernandez wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I would like to suggest the addition of a new standard_name to >> describe land-sea masks. A standard_name already exists: >> land_binary_mask ( >> X_binary_mask has 1 where condition X is met, 0 elsewhere. 1 = land, >> 0 = sea.). But in the ocean modelling community, we have already >> existing files describing those masks, but from an "ocean point of >> view", so 1 is for sea and 0 is for land points. >> So I would like to request the addition of the standard_name >> "*sea_binary**_mask*", >> with definition "X_binary_mask has 1 where condition X is met, 0 >> elsewhere. 1 = sea, 0 = land" and unit "1". >> >> Best regards, >> Elodie >> >> Click here <https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/MZbqvYs5QwJvpeaetUwhCQ==> >> to report this email as spam. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CF-metadata mailing list >> CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu >> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata > > > > _______________________________________________ > CF-metadata mailing list > CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
_______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata