This message came from the CF Trac system.  Do not reply.  Instead, enter your 
comments in the CF Trac system at https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/.

#104: Clarify the interpretation of scalar coordinate variables
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  jonathan        |       Owner:  [email protected]
      Type:  enhancement     |      Status:  new                          
  Priority:  medium          |   Milestone:                               
 Component:  cf-conventions  |     Version:                               
Resolution:                  |    Keywords:                               
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment (by taylor13):

 Dear all,

 I vote against ticket 105 and I favor 104, but I think the wording is
 still not ideal for the addition to the end of section 5.7 which is
 proposed to read:

     "If a data variable has two or more scalar coordinate variables, they
 are regarded as though they were all independent coordinate variables with
 dimensions of size one. If two or more single-valued coordinates are not
 independent, but have related values (for instance, time and forecast
 period, or vertical coordinate and model level number, Section 6.2), they
 should be stored as coordinate or auxiliary coordinate variables of the
 same size one dimension, not as scalar coordinate variables."

 For the second sentence do we mean:  "If two or more single-valued
 coordinates are not independent, but have related values (for instance,
 station number and station name or vertical coordinate and model level
 number or station number and station name, Section 6.2), then one should
 be stored as a coordinate of size one dimension and the rest should be
 stored as associated auxiliary coordinate variables."

  I was confused by "should be stored as coordinate or auxiliary coordinate
 variables".  Which is it?

 Note besides modifying the end of the sentence, I replaced one of the "for
 instances"; it seems to me that time and forecast period would often be
 considered to be independent coordinates, no?  I'm not familiar with
 forecasting terminology, but I would think "period" would indicate the
 time since initialization whereas "time" would indicate the time at the
 end of the period.  These would be independent only if you assume all
 forecasts were initiated at the same time.

 Please clarify this before accepting the ticket.

 thanks,
 Karl

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/104#comment:33>
CF Metadata <http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/>
CF Metadata

This message came from the CF Trac system.  To unsubscribe, without 
unsubscribing to the regular cf-metadata list, send a message to 
"[email protected]" with "unsubscribe cf-metadata" in the body of your 
message.

Reply via email to