This message came from the CF Trac system. Do not reply. Instead, enter your comments in the CF Trac system at https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/.
#107: CF Data Model 1.7 -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: markh | Owner: [email protected] Type: task | Status: new Priority: medium | Milestone: Component: cf-conventions | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Comment (by markh): I feel that the conversation about !CellMeasures is nearly concluded. I'd like to suggest we move onto '''properties'''. There is [wiki:Ticket107Text9Nov13Properties suggested text] proposed. I have a starting question, linked to the [https://cf- pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/107#comment:10 statement]: I don't think we need references to properties, because I continue to think that we should not list possible values in the data model. That is a matter for vocabulary, not the conceptual model. I would like to understand this statement some more. The data model must reference the controlled vocabularies in some way, it is key to the data model that it uses vocabularies correctly. I can understand the ''listing possible values'' leads to far too much text, so I am interested in how we may effectively make the assertion that a particular controlled vocabulary must be used correctly within the data model and how we should reference that vocabulary. -- Ticket URL: <https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/107#comment:14> CF Metadata <http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/> CF Metadata This message came from the CF Trac system. To unsubscribe, without unsubscribing to the regular cf-metadata list, send a message to "[email protected]" with "unsubscribe cf-metadata" in the body of your message.
