Thanks for your HELP & TIME Dave! -----Original Message----- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:35 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources?
> If i had the time to break code and write test cases and > docs on WDDX ...CFMX.. i would have done so... have to > work...on development like everybody else on this list.. > and then do testing on my spare time.... I was hoping some > MM folks would know something on internals... that was the > original reason.. to the post.. or if another developer > personally did some test... I am not complaining...WRONG... > the questions were pretty clear. DOES ANYONE KNOW INTERNALS > OF WDDX in CFMX? ANSWER:NO So i am back on my track to test.. > breaking code into pieces. I dont think any responsible > developer would provide their Prod Code... Code will follow > for the anxious A four-point response: 1. You could've broken the code into sections in the time that it took you to post this message. I mean, seven sections of code, we're talking about twenty lines of cut-n-paste code you'd have to add - two lines around each section, one additional line per section for output. Running one more load test would take, well, as much time as it's taken you to run previous load tests. 2. Maybe it's just me, but your posts don't seem to clearly state your questions in the way that you say they do. 3. Plenty of people post "Prod Code" on this list, every day. There's very little stuff in one CF program that hasn't been written thousands of times over in other CF programs. If you need to "sanitize" the code to remove specific portions, that's fine. However, you haven't posted any code at all - you haven't even posted pseudocode, really. 4. I don't think anyone's especially anxious to see your code. And, in closing, I think you misunderstood the point of my response; it wasn't to discuss how you're not playing well with others, or anything like that. Instead, it was an attempt to give you what I thought was the shortest path out of your current problem situation. You're free to use it, or not. You can continue waiting for some "deep throat" at Macromedia to say, "yes, there's a secret problem with line 55 of the CF MX module which handles WDDX serialization on Windows platforms on Tuesdays during a full moon". Good luck, though, with whichever path you choose. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists