Sean, This is what i understand from Microsoft's documentation. In Theory MS says there is no difference between C#.net code and VB.net code but they also push C# and say C# is optimized to perform better. One of our senior MS developer even proved this right.. MS says C# is their biggest weapon against any other language...theory again.. Unfortunately it would take a lot of hard work/testing to prove all this theory.
Example.. the code i was testing for JSP and CFM was tested on C# as well.. We couldnt time it correctly..cause a million iterations timed at 0 Milliseconds or 10 milliseconds.. and loops had to be increased to get a decent timing. C# proved to be faster than JSP/CFM... but these tests are not done with any given standards or variables... How do we know accurately...C#'s time standards are the same as other languages? Its just hard to compare 10ms and 15ms or 20ms without perfect given conditions/variables. It would be really great to have an independent/unbiased testing group that validates all this theory software corps come up with. Joe > On Friday, September 20, 2002, at 01:40 , Joe Eugene wrote: > > this means less overhead and code will execute even > > faster than a traditional C++ program. > > I'm not sure how you arrive at that (unfounded) conclusion... ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
