ditto - we have almost the exact same experience Rob. Including some of the same WDDX problems.
We are only recommending CFMX for low volume intranet sites or niche sites with little load. AND we are really only hosting applications ON cfmx that have been built FOR cfmx - rather than porting existing applications. That seems to have helped maintain some stability. For that purpose it's worked pretty well (although that JDBC socket reset error is puzzling and frustrating). We are still using CF 5 for servers with many web sites, high volume web sites and/or legacy applications. -mk -----Original Message----- From: Robert Everland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:48 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF! Why not downgrade to 5 and put CFMX into development until you are sure it's rock solid. I have absolutely no issues with CF5, but have had issues with CFMX. You gotta hit Macromedia in the pocketbook if you want to see results. If they know you won't spend money until they fix their issues then they will rush it out faster. I just had a case yesterday where a company we deal with upgraded from 4.5 to CFMX (not sure if it was updated yet) but WDDX reads didn't work and it was screwing up how it was dumping data into wddx, converting bit fileds to boolean. Robert Everland III Web Developer Extraordinaire Dixon Ticonderoga Company http://www.dixonusa.com -----Original Message----- From: Lee Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:41 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF! Yup.. I know I'm not the only one. This is something that either wasn't thoroughly tested, is due to a major change in technology-base, simply occuring in too few systems... SOMETHING. I'm not sure why this isn't been directly addressed and squashed. But it's not. And I refuse to go to the board and ask for additional $'s to fix a technology that supports a minority of users. Don't get me wrong.. I LOVE CF. We use it extensively and I love coding it. Much of our services and support to our clients is based on CF. But this simply is gone beyond the point of "something you have to deal with." It's now an issue of losing business, time, money... and... MY HAIR! Look forward to your posts later. | I know the feeling. I'm going through the same problems right | now - Currently investigating everything and due to post my | findings later today (they aint amounting to much at the | moment unfortunately). Was just about to go look at that. | See thread: CFMX - I've never seen anything so unstable in my life ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
