We, too, are in an organization that's going to Oracle Application Server for J2EE. We 
may or may not be able to push our CFMX for J2EE on JRun. If not, it's Bye Bye CF 
unless we can run it on Oracle.

Chris Norloff

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
from: "Trey Rouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:23:27 -0500

>CFMX for j2ee does not support our vendor solution (oracle).  As per my
>original message, many .edu's and corporations have purchased bulk
>licensure from oracle to support their databases that includes oracles
>j2ee server.  I have raised this issue throughout the entire CFMX for
>j2ee development cycle without a response.
>
>However, this goes far beyond CF's support of j2ee.  For example, if we
>maintain some orgs developing in CFMX for j2ee, but other orgs do native
>j2ee programming, we would have to purchase cfmx for j2ee licensure for
>every j2ee server in our enterprise in order to share code out of the
>cfmx development teams.  And that holds to the caveat that CFMX for j2ee
>would even run on all major label j2ee servers in the marketplace,
>which, as I've said it does not.
>
>As such, it is not a viable j2ee alternative in our enterprise, and from
>speaking with other enterprise and .edu folks, we are not alone in this
>conclusion.
>
>Believe me, I had hoped all along from the first incarnation I heard
>about Neo/cfmx j2ee solutions that it would maintain CFML as a RAD
>solution for our enterprise, but the delivered product is far shy of
>that expectation.
>
>Trey Rouse
>Rice University
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 12:59 PM
>> To: CF-Talk
>> Subject: RE: How Good is the Job Market for ColdFusion?
>> 
>> Trey, apologies if I missing something here, but CFMX has J2EE
>> capabilities.
>> I know that sounds obvious but are they not considered to be
>sufficient
>> for
>> your infrastructure?
>> 
>> Kind Regards - Mike Brunt, CTO
>> Webapper
>> http://www.webapper.com
>> Downey CA Office
>> 562.243.6255
>> AIM - webappermb
>> 
>> "Webapper - Making the NET work"
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Trey Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:38 AM
>> To: CF-Talk
>> Subject: RE: How Good is the Job Market for ColdFusion?
>> 
>> 
>> I mostly agree with your position that CFML is a more rapid
>development
>> tool than j2ee.  However, I think when you take a longer view and
>> consider performance, security factors, availability of work force,
>and
>> most importantly: range of vendor support, the ground rapidly falls
>out
>> from under CFML solutions.
>> 
>> But, more directly to the point you bring up, and why things happen
>the
>> way they do... In my experience, platform decisions and systems
>support
>> for these platforms are made at a tier above the development side of a
>> large organization.  Often times it is summarily decided far up the
>> corporate ladder.  I know in our scenario, the systems folks that
>urged
>> us to move up to site licensing want us to recoup costs by not running
>> tandem technologies where not critically necessary.
>> 
>> You're argument still stands true, but in reality developer
>departments
>> rarely carry enough decision making clout in most corporate or
>> educational bureaucracies to drive these decisions.  Unfortunately, we
>> all have a hard time making this argument, and when we do, we mostly
>> sound like we are just defending our turf.
>> 
>> In my experience, solutions like j2ee seem to be winning in the
>> enterprise marketplace as our desperate development teams can openly
>> share code and effort between sub organizations without additional
>> licensure.  Since j2ee code is far more easily distributed onto
>> different vendor servers.
>> 
>> When we factor in the duplication of effort that exists with some
>groups
>> running cf and others running j2ee, the fact that cf is more rapid
>> begins not to hold as much water.
>> 
>> 
>> Trey Rouse
>> Rice University
>> 
>> and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Reply via email to