I would suggest that DW have a Coldfusion Studio mode. When you switch to that mode DW
becomes a dedicated Coldfusion IDE and then we can switch back to DW mode for 
designers.
This way we have the best of both worlds.  DW is a pretty good product but I think it's
trying to do too much.

Ben Forta wrote:

> Dave,
>
> All valid points.
>
> And one more to consider, HomeSite/Studio is written in Delphi - the
> only MM product to be written in that language. That's why there was no
> Mac version (something lots of folks asked for back in Allaire days).
> It's hard to cost-justify keeping a team of Delphi developers to
> maintain one product - especially one that sells only a fraction of what
> DW sells.
>
> Trust me, this was not an easy decision, but it was a responsible one.
> In case anyone was unaware, these are tough times - there is something
> to be said for fiscal responsibility.
>
> But ... the discussion is not over yet. If any of you will be at DevCon
> (you all will be, right?) we'll be having an open forum Tuesday evening
> where you'll be able to share your ideas, concerns, suggestions, etc.
> pertaining to CF development environments - and you are encouraged to
> share it all - the good, the bad, and the ugly. I can't promise any
> particular outcome, but I can promise that in attendance will be
> individuals who are thinking this all through and so this will be your
> chance to talk to the right people directly.
>
> I hope to see you all there!
>
> --- Ben
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwatts@;figleaf.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:57 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Anybody want to start a petition for CF Studio!
>
> > Why the heck would they kill CF Studio? What good,
> > logical reason could they possibly come up with as
> > a reason to discontinue something that is so widely
> > used/loved?
>
> Maybe it's not as widely used/loved as you think. I suspect that
> Macromedia has a better idea of how many people are using it than I do,
> since they keep count of the products they sell.
>
> However, even assuming it's the most popular editor since Tina Brown,
> there are still good reasons for MM to "kill" CF Studio. One good reason
> is that they have a bunch of different IDEs, and there are obvious
> benefits to building one really good IDE from all of them. This is the
> approach used by Microsoft with Visual Studio, which started out as a
> bunch of separate tools, each with its own quirks. The latest version of
> Visual Studio is very impressive; it did take MS a couple of versions to
> get where they are, and some of those versions weren't so hot.
>
> But in any case, CF Studio isn't dead yet. It's simply been renamed
> "Homesite+". It'll probably be around for some time to come. The fact
> that it comes in a box labeled "Dreamweaver MX" doesn't change that.
>
> > Its not that we cant use dreamweaver, its just that
> > as coders, developers, and designers most of us, I
> > would assume, don't want all the extra crap that DWMX
> > has, and just want the IDE that CFStudio Provided.
>
> I don't know about that. There's a lot of "extra crap" in DWMX that's
> more interesting to me than it would be for the typical user of
> Dreamweaver 4 - interfaces for web services and components, properties
> dialogs, automatic management of file path attributes when you move a
> file, etc. There's a lot that DWMX is missing, and there are quite a few
> things that I don't like, but I think that one or two versions from now,
> it's going to be quite a nice editor.
>
> Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
> http://www.figleaf.com/
> voice: (202) 797-5496
> fax: (202) 797-5444
>
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Reply via email to