Does Macromedia know this is a bug? Was this corrected in CFMX? -----Original Message----- From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwatts@;figleaf.com] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 2:52 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: cfstoredproc behavior
> The parameters aren't in the same order as in the > stored procedure, but is there any way to get > around this "feature". That sounds like a severe > limitation of the tag. I'd rather not have to put > the parameters in order, that is what the dbvarname > attribute is for. Does this happen all the time > or is there a way to reproduce this behavior? I'm pretty sure that you always have to specify the parameters in order. I agree that you shouldn't have to do that, if you go to the trouble of using the DBVARNAME attribute, but there it is. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
