I have a java cfx that does this, but so far it only works with jpg's. It's very fast though.
I'll gladly post the code on here should you want it. I think if you're going to use java tags in cf you should at least learn how to compile it yourself, you may understand how the tag works better that way. So I wont be sending anyone the actual cfx. Craig. -----Original Message----- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2002 15:52 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFX_Image - Quality of images not good when rotating Hi, Kay. The cfx_pwimageproc tag looks very interesting. I've reviewed it's description on your site. So the tag, when resizing an image, actually creates a separate file, "outfile", when executed, right? And the smaller, thumbnail, is actually a new, smaller size (disk space size) than the original. If so, then this would be a good solution for creating thumbnail images of larger images, also. I'm looking for a solution that will allow me to create thumbnails on the fly for things like employee directories and church directories which users can upload images into themselves. I'd like to setup the site so that the users, who might not know how to use a graphics program to resize photos, could just upload a single photo, and let the site create thumbnails as needed. Am I understanding the tag correctly? Thanks, Rick Rick Faircloth Prism Productions -----Original Message----- From: Kay Smoljak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:12 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFX_Image - Quality of images not good when rotating Mark Smeets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone experienced this when rotating images using this tag? The moment > I rotate an image, the quality is degraded. I checked through the IML readme > file that the tag comes with and after adding the quality command, there's > been no improvement. Are you having the problem with 16 or 24 bit colour images? If you're using Jukka Manner's original version, it was designed for GIFs and uses an internal 256 bit palette, which is why JPEGs don't look so good. Here's a plug... We wrote an alternative for use on our own projects - cfx_pwimageproc - and we also sell it for US $99 at http://developer.perthweb.com.au. There's a demo you can try to see if the quality suits your purpose. HTH, Kay. Kay Smoljak ---------------- http://kay.smoljak.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
