What exactly are you comparing? If you compare load time remember that CFMX has to compile the CFM the first time it's run which takes time. This only happens once.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Fregas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:13 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: CFMX Performance > > > As we all know, CFMX compiles to Java Bytecode and gets > cached this way. Therefore, CFMX should be considerably > faster than CF5. However, a friend of mine did a very simple > perfornance test using CFMX that had NO database interaction > (just looping and finding prime numbers) and didn't see much > of a speed increase. Is there something special you have to > do in the new cf administrator to force it to cache these > files as Java classes/bytecode? This is CFMX Pro, not andy > of the J2EE versions. > > Thanks, > Craig > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
