> > > This is CFMX Pro, not any of the J2EE versions. > > > > That doesn't make any significant difference for your > > purposes, I don't think. > > According to what I have read, CFMX for J2EE has been > optimized to perform better and scale better than CFMX > Standalone -- especially for multiple-CPU systems (you > pay more, you get more -- fair enough!).
I've heard the same thing, but haven't really seen any good, thorough explanations about what's exactly different. In any case, I don't think it would make any difference for the test run by the original poster. > But the performance test seems to bear (or is that bare) > this out. No, it's "bear" - you were right to begin with. Dave Watts, English Maven, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
