That's only more frustrating to hear. Especially considering that it _does_ happen to me on multiple machines.
-Kevin > -----Original Message----- > From: Clint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:20 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?) > > > I use Flash on multiple machines from Win98 to Win XP Pro and I > have not had > any of the problems that you describe.. > > Clint > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kevin Graeme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:16 AM > Subject: RE: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?) > > > > I have numerous problems with simple things like scroll bars > disappearing > > and the whole environment losing windows after a test publish and such. > And > > it happens on multiple installations of different XP machines. > > > > I've reported bugs to the wish form, but that's just like > spitting into a > > black hole considering this bug was reported at least 6 months ago. > > > > -Kevin > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Mike Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:56 PM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?) > > > > > > > > > I do development in Flash on mac and windows, and I do not find > > > it buggy. At > > > least not any more buggy than any other app I use on a day to > day basis. > > > > > > mike chambers > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Kevin Graeme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 5:20 PM > > > Subject: RE: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?) > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:08 PM > > > > > To: CF-Talk > > > > > Subject: Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, Mar 1, 2003, at 17:22 US/Pacific, dwayne wrote: > > > > > > If Flash is serious about being the next Generation Web > Interface, > > > > > > they must introduce an application that makes it easy > to generate > > > > > > "Dynamic" RIA. > > > > > > > > > > I take it you don't think Flash MX is a suitable authoring > environment > > > > > for Flash movies? > > > > > > > > > > > > Sean, do you do Flash development? While FlashMX is > potentially a nice > > > > authoring tool, it's so buggy that it can be extremely > > > frustrating to work > > > > with. Basic things like scroll bars in the app disappearing > > > make it really > > > > hard to get work done. And I know that bug was reported at > > > least 5 months > > > > ago and the only update to FLMX is the documentation. > > > > > > > > -Kevin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
