That's sort of what I was afraid of. If it's legal XPath syntax, then why doesn't the XmlSearch function support it? Is it a weakness in MX, or is this a deliberate omission? And does anybody know if MM has plans to support this in the future?
-----Original Message----- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 11:24 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: XPath in CFMX Mueller, Ben wrote: > Yes, that is exactly what I want. It would appear (at least from > Microsoft's website) that this is legal Xpath syntax. A previous poster > suggested that this may have been an extension MS made that falls outside > the w3c spec. At this point, I'd be happy with confirmation that a call > like "Books/Book/@type" is just illegal according to the w3c spec. I think it is legal syntax. http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath section 2.5 Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
