> The Access databases are small and simple- not worth taking > up resources on an expensive Oracle server.
I would recommend that you reconsider. If you've already got the expensive Oracle server, you might as well use it; I expect you'd find an overall savings on resources. > We've always connected to them in the past in 4.5.2. I > realize there are new drivers now- I just would have > expected them to be just as stable as the old versions > of the drivers. That apparently doesn't seem to be the > case. Connecting to Access databases, or other ODBC datasources for that matter, is a bit more complex in CFMX than in previous versions of CF. You'll still be using the same ODBC drivers you used before, but in addition, you'll be using a service (SequeLink) to let CFMX talk to those ODBC drivers. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
