Yeah, Just trying to remind you (and me and everyone) that there are other transport protocols, some of which are better at transferring large binary and text files than http.
Jerry Johnson >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/03/03 11:47AM >>> no kidding :-) I am not intersted in FTP.. I am looking for cfx tags,etc that might interact with http better than cfhttp. Make sense? Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:38 AM Subject: Re: alternatives to cfhttp > ftp? > > (That's what it is for...) > > Jerry Johnson > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/03/03 11:23AM >>> > anyone know of any reliable alternatives to cfhttp? I am tyring to send a pretty good sized csv file and it tends to bonk out often.. (success rate of about 60%)... > > Thanks, > > Mike > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
