post the code you are using to create the array of structs from the query
results.

+-----------------------------------------------+
Bryan Love
  Database Analyst
  Macromedia Certified Professional
  Internet Application Developer
TeleCommunication Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-----------------------------------------------+

"...'If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have
peace'..."
        - Thomas Paine, The American Crisis

"Let's Roll"
        - Todd Beamer, Flight 93



-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Pacella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFC performance difficulties


Thanks for the reply Sean.  My one question is that I've been doing Java for
about 2 years and this is primarily the methodology we, as a company
subscribed to.....In situations where we had objects that would need to be
looked up frequently, we'd create Hashtables whose values would be the
objects we needed to look up.  This would give us easy access to the
objects...I thought that, with ColdFusion, structures were essentially
Hashtables.  And, CFCs were essentially objects.  So I figured this would be
a "slam dunk".

Is there another way you would suggest, just speaking in general OO terms
even, that would speed up this problem?  If I'm catching your drift
properly, you are suggesting that my design is weak, and that CFC
limitations aren't the problem.  So, any help on the fallacies of my design
would be greatly appreciated...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq

This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
http://www.cfhosting.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to