Mark W. Breneman wrote: > There has got to be a better way of doing this. Isn't there?
No. > Jochem - Maybe I don't understand what you are saying. The problem I am > having is that I can not "run" a cfinclude that is in a database record. Are > you suggesting that I write 1000s of database records to files? That appears to be your only option now. > Seems to > kinda defeat the reason we made it a contentment management system in the > first place. Or am I not understanding you correctly. :-) You are understanding me correctly. > I think this is the equivalent of what I am trying to do: > I have a var that holds text and 1 cf include. > > <cfset foo='Here is the current results:<cfinclude template="test.cfm">' > > > <cfoutput>#foo#</cfoutput> That should be (pseudocode): <cfset foo='Here is the current result:<cfinclude template="test.cfm">'> <cffile action="write" file="foo.cfm" output="#foo#"> <cfinclude template="foo.cfm"> <cffile action="delete" file="foo.cfm"> I do have some doubt about the performance of that. It requires a lot of time for both I/O and CFML compilation for each request. You might be better of rethinking the mechanism. Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
