In response to the criticism that FB3 is slow, the framework itself is not much of an issue in terms of speed. I have two substantial CF5/FB3 applications where the average page generation time is 50ms (+-3ms) up to 250 concurrent users. I don't know what kinds of results everyone else gets, but these are impressive.
M -----Original Message----- From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:06 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Cons to Fusebox Here's some arguments against using FB4: ... - it's not supported (neither is Struts) - it makes slow apps (a valid argument against FB3, not so with FB4) - it's hard to use (there's an initial learning curve, but after that, everything is easier and faster) ... Not quite what you were looking for, I'm sure, but hopefully useful none the less. cheers, barneyb --- Barney Boisvert, Senior Development Engineer AudienceCentral [EMAIL PROTECTED] voice : 360.756.8080 x12 fax : 360.647.5351 www.audiencecentral.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
