Matt Liotta did some checking and it appears that for every sub tag in cfform (e.g. <cfinput ..> ) the page rendering times grow exponentially.
That was in up3 i think. WG -----Original Message----- From: Michael T. Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 July 2003 15:08 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFForm madness. 0_0 I suppose so. I have used it in the past quite a bit, but found it fell short in some areas or I had to combine it with additional JS. It just made more sense to me to use one or the other, and since the qForms API or even custom written stuff was more flexible I have just kind of stuck with that. Nothing against really, I just often need more than what it offers. Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kola Oyedeji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:03 AM Subject: RE: CFForm madness. 0_0 > Interesting I used to be of the same mind set, however after taking > another look I think the cfform validation (not the built in cfserver > validation) is quite useful. > > Why re-invent the wheel? Granted its not that flexible but when you > quickly want to knock up a form with a few required fields it saves on > development time. > > Mike I'd suggest another look, they may be more useful( or useless ;-) ) > than you think. > > > Kola > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Michael T. Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: 22 July 2003 14:53 > >> To: CF-Talk > >> Subject: Re: CFForm madness. 0_0 > >> > >> Thats a good question :-) > >> > >> Some things in CF are available, yet not recommended by alot of > users; > >> cfform is one of them. > >> In terms of validation and having more flexibility Id recommend using > >> qForms > >> API (www.pengoworks.com). > >> > >> Mike > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Angel Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:49 AM > >> Subject: RE: CFForm madness. 0_0 > >> > >> > >> > What's so horrible about using CFFORM for simple validation for a > field > >> > that's either required/not required?? > >> > > >> > Isn't that why it is included in CFMX? > >> > > >> > -Gel > >> > > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) > >> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > >> > the fact you are using cfform is sheer madness! > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
