While working on Mach-II, Ben Edwards and I have been really pleased
with CFCs in version 6.1. Kudos to the dev team.

Hal Helms
"Java for CF Programmers" class 
in Las Vegas, August 18-22
www.halhelms.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:46 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Testimonials on CFMX 6.1


On Wednesday, Aug 6, 2003, at 09:43 US/Pacific, Judith Dinowitz wrote:
> Hi. With the release of ColdFusion 6.1, we would like to hear from
> people who've had both good and bad experiences with the upgrade.

One "testimonial" worth noting is that as of 7/31, all macromedia.com 
production servers were running entirely on CFMX 6.1 as was the 
Macromedia Intranet. As of 8/1 all our macromedia.com QA servers were 
running CFMX 6.1 and as of 8/2 all our macromedia.com development 
servers were running CFMX 6.1. That's a total of 17 instances across 12 
servers. Each upgrade took only about 30 minutes, start to finish and 
the only glitch was that the upgrades did not preserve our web.xml file 
(so we had to back it up manually).

Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq

Get the mailserver that powers this list at 
http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to