Ben Forta wrote: > Less forgiving perhaps, or it could be that it just does a lot less and > thus has less reserved words. Don't get me wrong, I like MySQL and use > it myself for some projects, but it is nowhere near as feature rich > (yet) as SQL Server (or Oracle or ...).
The problem is lack of standard compliance. According to the standard, you can bypass any reserved word issue by enclosing the identifier in identifier quotes. But if you don't use them, or use a database that doesn't support them, you are bound to run into problems. Jochemn ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
