Nicholas, there are major differences between Mach II and Fusebox 3.0 which really make them incomparable. Here are some major differences. FB 30 is a framework for procedural programming style (as against an OO based style).
Mach II is firmly rooted in an OO based style. Mach II uses ColdFusion Components (cfc's) available only in ColdFusion MX and 6.1. There are many more differences; these are the main basic ones. Fusebox 3.0 to 4.0 would be a more logical comparison. Fusebox 4.0 is procedural but uses xml fairly heavily. ColdFusion MX would still be preferred for using FB 4.0 because of its xml handling capabilities as compared to CF 5.0. However, there is some code out there to somewhat mitigate this. Hth. Kind Regards – Mike Brunt Original Message ----------------------- Is Mach II faster than Fusebox 3? What are the advantages of Mach II over Fusebox 3. Thanks, Nicholas W. Watson Software Engineer Concurrent Technologies Corporation Phone: (814) 269-2653 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com
