Ummm.... Maybe I'm confused... but doesn't sandboxing cover the requirements adressed here? IE I'm pretty damn sure you can't do anything particularly nasty with CFFILE or CFDIRECTORY on my shared boxes... because my sandboxes are locked down tight.
Admittedly? if you're dealing with non enterprise licences you don't have sandboxes... but its a bit unrealistic to ask MM to give you one of the primary commercial incentives to upgrade with the cutdown distribution. -----Original Message----- From: Miller, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 5 September 2003 1:50 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: DWMX 2004 - Whats new for us? Better yet, why can't MM add some hosting-friendly options to the server global settings so that they can address a need for a major customer segment? Does a list of potential options exist? If we don't ask as a group with a unified voice, the request will never work its way to the top of the To-Do list. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 8:20 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: DWMX 2004 - Whats new for us? I don't think they'd have any choice. Of course, what they should do, is provide a cf_file which is a wrapper round cffile, but appends your hosted directory path to all the path/filename arguments or something. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
