- Calvin
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael T. Tangorre
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:21 PM
Subject: RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup
I don't think it matters, since we all know where they are anyways :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Owens, Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 6:45 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup
Speaking of more legitimacy -- what's up with chain bookstores always filing
the CF titles under "graphic/web design"?
I asked an employee of my local Barnes and Nobel the other day and he said
this was a corporate decision.
Personally, it always irks me that CF books aren't in with the programming
books. Maybe we should all start complaining to the chains about this, and
MM -- MM should file its own protests. I think.
H.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Howard Owens
Internet Operations Coordinator
Ventura County Star / E.W. Scripps Co.
www.venturacountystar.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM: GoCatGo1956
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Hodder [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:38 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup
>
> Jim McAtee wrote:
>
> > There's already a CF newsgroup. Why the need for another?
>
> It's covered in the comp.lang.coldfusion rationale. Some of us on the
> existing alt.comp.lang.coldfusion group feel a "proper" comp.* group
> would give ColdFusion more legitimacy, as well as the group having
> better propagation, longer message retention periods, etc.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dave
>
> _____
>
> [ Todays Threads
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
