It would have to do the search more than twice, it woudl have to do every
possible case combination of either the string or the RE.  I suspect that
internally it just does a LOWER or UPPER on both the RE and the string.
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Philip Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 8:15 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: RE: number of occurrences in a string.

  Wouldn't it be "faster" to use a Lower() on the string rather than
  REFindNoCase?

  I thought that doing a NoCase does the search twice, so on long strings,
  it could be slower...

  Just a thought

[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to