I know a lot of VB programmers who know the bare minimum about OO, makes me
wonder how they do what they do!
-----Original Message-----
From: Samuel R. Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Visual basic/ActiveX
No, learning VB6 first will probably make it harder.
I'd suggest learning C# or VB.NET. There are few real differences between
C# and VB.NET other than syntax but C# has a much higher standing in the MS
community...VB developers still thought of as second class. For that
reason, I'd suggest C# instead.
Beware of articles and books by people moving from VB6 to VB.NET that have
no OOP experience. I remember the first VB conference I went to after .NET
came out was really funny 'cause all the speakers were VB6 pros but none of
them had a real grasp of OOP as you'd gain from studying Java.
My $0.02.
Sam
-----------------------------------------------
Blog: http://www.rewindlife.com <http://www.rewindlife.com>
Charts: http://www.blinex.com/products/charting
<http://www.blinex.com/products/charting>
-----------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bushy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:26 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Visual basic/ActiveX
>
> What would you suggest I start learning? I guess it would an
> easier transition if I learned VB 6 first?
>
> --Original Message Text---
> From: Doug White
> Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 07:23:22 -0600
>
> The syntax between VB6 and VB DOT NET is very different -
> like different languages
>
_____
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- RE: Visual basic/ActiveX Tangorre, Michael
- RE: Visual basic/ActiveX Tangorre, Michael
- RE: Visual basic/ActiveX Shawn Regan
- RE: Visual basic/ActiveX Dave Watts