efficient way to handle Scheduled Tasks, since they take up Application
Server Resources.
I would have another server handle all Offline tasks as Batch Jobs, Use
RMI/WebServices
to invoke applications that need to run Batch Jobs.
Yes, there are Other Bugs in CFMX and am hoping MM would try to solve them
asap.
Joe Eugene
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:21 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on
Win2k/CMX6.1
The only problem we have with CFMX is the scheduler application under
administrator. When we put scheduled events in MX they don't seam to run on
the schedule we assign to them (don't run at all or run at different times).
We were unable to fix this problem and thus all scheduled events are stuck
on 5.0 server. Other than that there have been no major issues with the
stability of the MX servers.
As for the language itself, I admit that there are some bugs in CFMX, but
I am hoping that MM will fix most of them in the next release.
TK
----- Original Message -----
From: Boldacious Web Design
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:53 AM
Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on
Win2k/CMX6.1
What are other people's views on this - how many people are using
MX with no problems?
================ You wrote ================
>>I suggest the user with problems with the server product, to
uninstall >>it completely and revert to CF 5.0, until Macromedia
gets its act
>> together. While a lot was accomplished with the 6.1 release
over >>previous editions, it still is not a stable product., and
IMHO should >>not even be on the market.
Seamus Campbell Boldacious WebDesign
http://www.boldacious.com ~~~~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph 02 6297 4883 fax 02 6297 4883 mob 0410 609 267
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
