I have noticed that "programmer" like Studio much better than Dreamweaver
whereas "web site designers" like dreamweaver.
They may both program in CF but the difference to me is that one is written
with a coder in mind and the other was written with a designer in mind.
I cam from a programming background, I mean hardcore as in C++ with VI or
Emacs...so to me CF 5 is much better...
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Farmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Joining the dark side - using DWMX
ALLAIRE RULES!!!!
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Watts
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:43 PM
Subject: RE: Joining the dark side - using DWMX
> CFS5 Kicks DWMX ass anytime. It is faster and more stable. I
> don't care what hardware you are on - the bottom line is that
> CFS5 is faster than DWMX on any hardware.
We're talking about a text editor, not a compiler. How fast does it have
to
be? On my laptop (which is hardly a blazing machine) Dreamweaver MX 2004
runs well enough that it doesn't slow me down any.
In exchange, it gives me a usable design view, templates, an incredibly
powerful search and replace interface, and all sorts of other stuff I find
very helpful.
There are plenty of things I don't like about Dreamweaver, but they're
outweighed by the good things in my opinion. For that matter, there were
plenty of things I didn't like about CF Studio - it's not like that was
God's gift to text editing, either.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/ <http://www.figleaf.com/>
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
