Well, I think what Steven meant is that CFS5 functions are more geared
towards your average generalized programmer while functions in DWMX are more
suitable for your average generalized web site designer. I don't think using
notepad makes someone a better programmer - it lucks some basic futures that
I as a programmer find useful, then again I know many people that stick with
notepad like utilities (all of them are from *nix world - not to say that
Win people are unable to use it).

Disclaimer :) I am just generalizing here, I am sure there are people that
stand out of the crowd. Also, my generalizations are based on my personal
experience and might not be representative of the whole profession.

TK
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 2:37 PM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Re: Joining the dark side - using DWMX

  If that's the case, I must be a better programmer than you, because I
  use jEdit.  No sissy snippet functions for me.  Hah!  If I was any more
  of a man, I'd use windows notepad or maybe even edlin.

  marlon

  Schuster, Steven wrote:

  > Fundamental difference between programmers and web developers...
  >
  >
  > I have noticed that "programmer" like Studio much better than
Dreamweaver
  > whereas "web site designers" like dreamweaver.
  >
  >
  > They may both program in CF but the difference to me is that one is
  > written
  > with a coder in mind and the other was written with a designer in mind.
  >
  >
  > I cam from a programming background, I mean hardcore as in C++ with VI
or
  > Emacs...so to me CF 5 is much better...
  >
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to