content at all. I was disagreeing with you suggesting that someone
should write for CFDJ. See my emails for why I believe writing CFML
content for an online publication would be better.
-Matt
On Jan 8, 2004, at 6:41 PM, Simon Horwith wrote:
> we were comparing CFDJ to other publications... things in print... you
> know,
> paper. There was no discussion of a comparison between the content in
> CFDJ
> and online resources before your post, nor should there be one
> now. Hell,
> if you want to compare the content in CFDJ or any other CFML reference
> to
> the content in one outstanding resource, why would it be
> builder.com????
> I'd say that builder.com doesn't even compare with macromedia.com's
> online
> documentation, devnet, etc. I think the point was that CFDJ was being
> compared with books and periodicals in print. Some people stated that
> they
> didn't think that it was worth it's price for a year's subscription
> compared
> to the price of some of the books that are out there. I'm not sure
> what
> that has to do with websites? There are a lot of great resources out
> there.
> I don't think CFDJ is the best CFML resource in the world, but I do
> personally think that what you get for the cost of receiving the
> magazine
> for a year as opposed to one or two of the books on the market is much
> more
> worth the money. That's just me... and that's what (I thought) we were
> debating. Anyway - this is begining to sound like a thread that
> belongs on
> the CF Community list.
>
> ~Simon
>
> Simon Horwith
> CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
> Member of Team Macromedia
> Macromedia Certified Instructor
> Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
> Certified Flash MX Developer
> CFDJList - List Administrator
> http://www.how2cf.com/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 January 2004 23:29
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay
>
> Where did you get this "fact" that Builder is not a publication. Are
> you suggesting that Internet sites can't be publications? What is the
> difference between an online magazine and offline one? CFDJ makes
> content available online in addition to print. Does that make it less
> of a publication?
>
> I don't see any facts in your statement at all. What I do see is bias
> towards to the online publication industry. And it is an industry,
> that
> is growing, which the offline publishing industry certainly can't
> say.
>
> -Matt
>
> On Jan 8, 2004, at 5:30 PM, Simon Horwith wrote:
>
> > first of all, Fusebox and Mach II are not CFML - they're frameworks
> > that are
> > written in CFML. In the interest of conserving bandwidth, ignore
> that
> > I
> > said that - I don't feel like getting into (nor will I) a
> discussion
> > about
> > whether or not a forum that talks primaily about FB and MACH II is
> a
> > CFML
> > forum or not. What I welcome dialog about is the fact that
> > builder.com is
> > not a publication.
> >
> > ~Simon
> >
> > Simon Horwith
> > CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
> > Member of Team Macromedia
> > Macromedia Certified Instructor
> > Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
> > Certified Flash MX Developer
> > CFDJList - List Administrator
> >http://www.how2cf.com/
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 08 January 2004 18:19
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay
> >
> > > Got any examples? :O)
> > >
> > Of publications? Builder.com will pay for content and they have
> > published quite a bit of CFML related content. In fact, I have
> even
> > seen articles related to Fusebox and Mach-II.
> >
> > -Matt
> >
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
