I didn't think that the later comments stemmed from that post but rather
from Sandy's post indicating that that the section quoted really indicated
DHTML use - I don't think it needs to be taken that far since you can make a
page using only CSS that's unreadable without the sheet.
Either way I still think at the end there we had at least three people
fervently arguing very much the same thing. In short that using CSS does
not automatically mean better usability.
Of course if I mixed up the thread, then I'm sorry. it wouldn't be the first
time. ;^)
Jim Davis
_____
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 3:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Section 508
Jim Davis said:
> I think you're missing the point a little, Jochem (it's not often
> that you do tho', so we'll give you credit. ;^) ) In fact I think
> we're arguing the same thing.
>
> We're not arguing against the tools (CSS).
The original comment reads:
"(d) Documents shall be organized so they are readable without
requiring an associated style sheet.
Comment: The W3 tells us to use stylesheets for asseability purposes!
This item takes web design a step backwards instead of forwards."
Maybe I missed something in English class, but how can I interpret
this as anything but arguing against the tools (stylesheets and
accesibility standards)?
Jochem
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
