more to do with switching JREs in general. In talking to some people at
MAX, I heard that Jrocket is faster, but also more unstable(it crashes
faster). I personally don't know and could just be perpetuating a rumor or
severe bias... Oh well. I guess you might just want to try it out yourself
to see if it improves the performance of your own site. In the end, that's
all that counts.
Paul Kenney
WebMaster, CorporateWarriors.com
916-663-1963
-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan C. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 11:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: jRockit
"fully compatible" is a dangerous term.
I think JRockit meets the compatibility tests. There are many alternatives
to SUN that claim to be faster. The MS engine was supposed to be very fast.
I think the thing to remember is that when something appears broken, you
need to switch back to the Macromedia-provided JVM and test before you
declare something is broken or buggy.
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Wolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 1:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: jRockit
Hi All,
A few days ago, someone quoted Charlie Arehart regarding CFMX optimization
tips. One of the things that was mentioned was that you should replace the
Sun JRE with jRockit. I did some research and learned that jRockit is
distributed by BEA (for free).
Can anyone tell me more about jRockit? Why is it better than the Sun JRE?
Is it fully compatible with the Sun version? Is it fully compatible with
CFMX?
Charlie, are you out there?
Thanks,
--
Michael Wolfe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
