> presented alternate frameworks on at least three
> different occasions.
... snip ...
> Again, who is doing that?
Just a general statement, but if you fear that shoe fits feel free to defend
yourself.
I was there at the CFUG meeting where you presented one of those alternate
frameworks, and it seemed like a sound idea. If you find the time to
publish any more details about it, I'd be interested in learning more about
them. Hopefully no Macromedia employees will use them or help out with them
though, that'd just be wrong wrong wrong... ;)
-Cameron
-----------------
Cameron Childress
Sumo Consulting Inc
---
land: 858.509.3098
cell: 678.637.5072
aim: cameroncf
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 12:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II
> You're right, it was confusing. My point is really that if you think
> you
> have a better solution, then that's great. If you can change the
> existing
> solution so that it overcomes your complaints, great, do it! Either
> way,
> build the community up and make it better, help others by sharing...
>
Who are you directing this at? I have certainly presented alternate
frameworks on at least three different occasions.
> It's very easy to complain about everything without being
> constructive about
> any of it. In this case, I think something *very* constructive is
> happening
> with Mach-ii.
>
Again, who is doing that? It seems to me that the most vocal people in
the CFML community tend also to be the ones contributing back to it.
-Matt
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
