> I agree with you
> that some people will make assumptions because of what Macromedia
> does in
> practice, and that's a sad fact of life that there's no way around.
>
Which is why Macromedia should have known better and avoided the
situation to begin with. For example, it would take someone of Sean's
ability very little time to produce a framework to meet their needs,
which would allow them to avoid using MachII. It is a simple
cost/benefit analysis, it is cheaper to create an internal framework
than the possible loss of revenue associated with ill will from the
community.
-Matt
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Jaye Morris
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Samuel R. Neff
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Jaye Morris
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Matt Liotta
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Samuel R. Neff
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Simon Horwith
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Matt Liotta
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Simon Horwith
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Matt Liotta
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Simon Horwith
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Matt Liotta
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Simon Horwith
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Christian Cantrell
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Matt Liotta
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Simon Horwith
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Cameron Childress
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Philip Arnold
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Cameron Childress
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Matt Liotta
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Cameron Childress
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Matt Liotta