On Feb 9, 2004, at 9:09 AM, Philip Arnold wrote:
> No disrepect meant here Christian, but there are a few of us here who
> are of the opinion that MM selecting MachII to use on their site is a
> glowing endorsement of the framework
Point taken. I was referring specifically to the statement that
Macromedia "screwed up" by using Mach II. My impression is that very
few people actually have a problem with this, however I also
acknowledge that we should be more clear about the fact that we are not
officially endorsing any particular project over another. When Sean
gets back into town, I will discuss this with him.
Christian
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Cameron Childress
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Matt Liotta
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Cameron Childress
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Matt Liotta
- Re:Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Isaac Dealey
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Jaye Morris
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Christian Cantrell
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Philip Arnold
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Geoff Bowers
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Christian Cantrell
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Christian Cantrell
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Charlie Griefer
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Mike Brunt
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Matt Liotta
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Philip Arnold
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Raymond Camden
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Matt Liotta
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Christian Cantrell
- Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Massimo Foti
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Mike Brunt
- RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II Simon Horwith