Hm. I wasn't implying that a stored procedure would run asynchronously. But,
I was implying that if you're making 15 separate calls to the database, your
bottle neck could be right there. If you can encapsulate those 15 queries
into one call to the database, that returns one recordset, you may save some
processing time. (Without knowing what they're doing for sure, though, I
couldn't say more than "maybe.")

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Nelson" ?

> Maybe I'm wrong, but I think even if you use a stored procedure it's going
> to process in series. I doubt it's going to give you a huge performance
> boost.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to