is some brand new concepts. I am using it extensively, but I haven't
managed to sell it to my (conservative) colleagues.
I think it is definately something for a bigger project, since then you
can plan the whole design using UML tools, and then design each object
separately (and unit test them).
--
Hugo Ahlenius
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hugo Ahlenius E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project Officer Phone: +46 8 230460
UNEP GRID-Arendal Fax: +46 8 230441
Stockholm Office Mobile: +46 733 467111
WWW: http://www.grida.no
-------------------------------------------------------------
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Michael Haggerty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 19:49
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: OT: Mach-II
|
| Last summer, there was a lot of optimism on this list
| surrounding the release of Mach-II and it's object oriented
| approach to ColdFusion. Having tried it on a few projects and
| decided Fusebox was better suited for what I was doing, I am
| now considering it for a larger project my team is about to
| commence (approx. 9,500 man hours over a 7 month period).
|
| One of my main concerns is having to train people to work
| within this framework, I remain one of three or four people
| in my organization who have actually heard of Mach-II. There
| is some resistance based on people's unfamiliarity with it
| and the perception other frameworks are more widely used.
| This got me to wondering about how much Mach-II is actually
| being used, so I am conducting one of those unscientific
| polls about technology usage:
|
| - Does your organization use Mach-II?
|
| - Care to comment on how your organization has benefited
| from using it?
|
| M
|
|
|
|
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
