There were some threads a while back that indicated the Java source
generated by CFMX 6.0 were inefficient (big and/or slow) compared to
the same app written in native Java.
I wonder how CFMX 6.1 measures up.
To narrow the comparison (a little) lets assume that there are valid
CFMX best practices, and that the CF programmer is above average, and
follows the best practices where warranted.
Anyone have any thoughts or experiences?
TIA
Dick
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- Re: SOT: Blackstone @ CF-FUN '04 Paul Kenney
- Re: SOT: Blackstone @ CF-FUN '04 Doug James
- RE: SOT: Blackstone @ CF-FUN '04 Ben Forta
- Re: SOT: Blackstone @ CF-FUN '04 Alexander Sherwood
- My app is crashing :( Brook Davies
- Re: My app is crashing :( Doug White
- RE: Blackstone @ CF-FUN '04 Samuel R. Neff
- Re: Blackstone @ CF-FUN '04 Dick Applebaum
- Re: Blackstone @ CF-FUN '04 Dick Applebaum
- Re: Blackstone @ CF-FUN '04 Paul Kenney
- RE: How does CF generated Java bytecode compar... Dick Applebaum
- RE: How does CF generated Java bytecode co... Barney Boisvert
- Re: How does CF generated Java bytecod... Dick Applebaum
- RE: How does CF generated Java bytecod... Barney Boisvert
- Re: How does CF generated Java bytecod... Dick Applebaum
- RE: How does CF generated Java bytecod... Barney Boisvert
- Re: How does CF generated Java bytecod... Dick Applebaum
- Re: How does CF generated Java bytecod... Thomas Chiverton
- RE: How does CF generated Java bytecod... Barney Boisvert
- Re: How does CF generated Java bytecod... Joe Eugene
- Re: How does CF generated Java bytecod... Thomas Chiverton