(but while there is a short silence, I'm going to throw in a soft spoken
request that this thread move to community?)
Alexander Sherwood wrote:
>At 09:56 AM 8/18/2004, you wrote:
>
>
>>>matt, i respect your intelligence, i respect your message,
>>>you are way off the scales on the iq chart im sure,
>>>but....your delivery sucks.
>>>if your personality was half of what your intelligence was,
>>>man, im sure you could be president. i hope this doesnt
>>>offend you, its not intended to do so, this list isnt the
>>>forum for this, and i dont have the time for it, but please,
>>>dont take offense, learn a lesson in people skills, it will
>>>GET YOU VERY FAR!!!!!!!!!!
>>>
>>>tony.
>>>
>>>
>>And with that... Tony single handedly silenced the list. LOL
>>
>>
>
>
>Nope.
>
>If the gateway doesn't support FuseBox 4.5 circuits and the FLiP process (not to mention .qry and .dsp files), then MACR should go with Mach-II listeners.
>
>Mach-II is really the best choice to build the forthcoming remote Java --> CFC invocation event-based gateway, by far.
>
>--
>True
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
