sites that can't use a scripting technology?
Your argument doesn't make much sense to me. Afterall, if you quit
using a CFML server, you'll instantly recognize that the CFM files
have tied you to a CFML server. At least with DWMX templates, you can
still edit the files with notepad if you don't have DWMX....
Marlon
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 14:37:56 -0400, Irvin Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > They don't tie you to Dreamweaver - you're free to use
> >whatever editor you like if you're willing to forego the benefits of
> >templates in the future.
> >
>
> Your statement can be re-worded like this: "The moment you sever your ties to Dreamweaver, the benefits of templates are not available to you"
>
> That's a tie, right there.
>
> There's no question that "Dreamweaver templates" (there's a good reason they are called that) is development technology proprietary to Dreamweaver.
>
> That said, it's not evil to use them. Just not very practical, in my opinion (or, as someone on this thread put it "DW templates are a poor man's includes").
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
