>Ok, if they're not so good, what do you suggest for straight HTML
>sites that can't use a scripting technology?
>
The simplest (and pretty obvious!) answer is: you just code yor page just line any of the millions of developers who don't use Dreamweaver.
****
On a more practical note, though: it's VERY hard to find a hosting company that doesn't allow the use of includes. So, why use Dreamweaver templates when simple includes do the same job without tying to to any particular HTML editor?
>Your argument doesn't make much sense to me. Afterall, if you quit
>using a CFML server, you'll instantly recognize that the CFM files
>have tied you to a CFML server. At least with DWMX templates, you can
>still edit the files with notepad if you don't have DWMX....
>
I don't quite understand what your point is...
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- Re: Dreamweaver Templates..? Irvin Gomez
- Re: Dreamweaver Templates..? Bob Haroche
- Re: Dreamweaver Templates..? Irvin Gomez
- Re: Dreamweaver Templates..? Bob Haroche
- Re: Dreamweaver Templates..? Mike Kear
- RE: Dreamweaver Templates..? Parker, Kevin
- RE: Dreamweaver Templates..? James Holmes
- RE: Dreamweaver Templates..? Dave Watts
- Re: Dreamweaver Templates..? Irvin Gomez
- Re: Dreamweaver Templates..? Marlon Moyer
- Re: Dreamweaver Templates..? Irvin Gomez
- Re: Dreamweaver Templates..? Bob Haroche
- Re: Dreamweaver Templates..? Irvin Gomez
- Re: Dreamweaver Templates..? Bob Haroche
- Sorry (was Re: Dreamweaver Templat... Bob Haroche
- RE: Dreamweaver Templates..? Dave Watts