>Ok, if they're not so good, what do you suggest for straight HTML
>sites that can't use a scripting technology?
>

The simplest (and pretty obvious!) answer is: you just code yor page just line any of the millions of developers who don't use Dreamweaver.

****

On a more practical note, though: it's VERY hard to find a hosting company that doesn't allow the use of includes. So, why use Dreamweaver templates when simple includes do the same job without tying to to any particular HTML editor?

>Your argument doesn't make much sense to me.  Afterall, if you quit
>using a CFML server, you'll instantly recognize that the CFM files
>have tied you to a CFML server.  At least with DWMX templates, you can
>still edit the files with notepad if you don't have DWMX....
>

I don't quite understand what your point is...
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to