Thanks Joe. All the other comments I'd seen about it said it included the upload. I dont want that - I want to use CFFILE and CFX_Image to process images and prevent non-images.
Does anyone else find these gadgets slow to load? I just went to the FCKEditor's site and found it took 48 seconds to finish loading the page with the basic editor in it. I tried FCKEditor about 18 months ago and gave up on it for the same reason. I ended up using SPAW-CF on one site and I'm disappointed with that too because (amongst other things) it takes to long to load. I find i have users trying to enter stuff before it's finished loading all teh toolbars and gettting annoyed because it makes a mess of their data unless they wait the whole 40-60 seconds for it to load. Is this just me? I'm on a 512KB ADSL line - not the fastest that exists, but faster than a lot of the users. Cheers Mike Kear Windsor, NSW, Australia AFP Webworks http://afpwebworks.com .com,.net,.org domains from AUD$20/Year On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 05:33:41 -0800, Joe Rinehart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike, > > FCKEditor includes an image picker, but pretty much leaves the > "uploader" part up to you to code for yourself. It really is a great, > well thought-out tool. > > -Joe > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - New Atlanta http://www.newatlanta.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:187195 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
