Look at Mach-II if you want to see a best-practice approach for what you are talking about. You don't have to take the full OO approach that Mach-II uses, but the overall idea that you separate your data access layer into objects (CFCs in this case) is part of the Mach-II framework and other OO programming models.
I've just been playing with Mach-II lately, others on the list who are closer to the framework or are otherwise experienced OO programmers may have more detail to share with you. > Hi, I have determined I have some database schema issues necessitating > rewriting the data access code. Currently I use cfquery with a couple > stored procedures. Since the new database structure will require I > change these queries, I am contemplating the idea of creating cfc's > which contain stored procedures to handle the data access for the site. > I am not the uber programmer to be sure, and to me the idea seems cool, > but am unsure of the real benefits in terms of reuse, speed, etc. I > was wondering if anyone had experience moving their data access into > cfcs using stored procedures, and what their experience was like, what > their motivations were, and how they feel about having done it now. > Was it a good idea, and would they do it again? Any comments greatly > appreciated. > > Thanks, > > John ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:189672 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
