On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:30:25 -0500, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess I have to see more CFCs. The ones I've seen 'assume' that server, > application, session, and client exist and do not have to be passed in.
I would classify those as "not good practice". > I usually even see request.DSN 'assumed' into the form. Another bit of "not good practice". > This brings up the question if the overhead of writing and passing all of > this data in order to encapsulate is worth it or just being dogmatic? It > feels very much like dogma over use to me, but that's me. What overhead? Passing a single argument by reference? That's definitely worth it. -- Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/ Breeze Me! -- http://www.corfield.org/breezeme Got Gmail? -- I have 5 invites to give away! "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:190873 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
