> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 9:57 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use > > Recall that many asp sites use "default.asp" ... not index.asp, whereas > CF's > "index.cfm" is far more standard.
Although some of us use default.cfm (as at www.nefn.com) as well. Add to that the number of people that mask the extension entirely and the (large number, as Ben said) behind firewalls (and not just for CF) and in the end I don't think any of the numbers available via Google are very useful. I'm not sure how you would get comparative numbers... with CF it's tempting to go by sales (which assumes if somebody buys a product they'll use it) but that cuts out the very large number of shared hosting applications (one purchased license might support dozens of separate applications). It's also impossible to judge ASP via sales. So I'm not sure how to get "real" numbers... Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193104 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
