On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:43:13 -0500, Ben Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Because they want a J2EE app not a ColdFusion app. > Which is just a matter of semantics, correct?
Perhaps, but it's important to some people. > I'm at a loss for why I'd want to duplicate the functionality of the > ColdFusion administrator. You're missing the point. The scenario is that you create an application that is going to be packaged and distributed as a J2EE application. You do not want or need to expose the entire CF Admin as part of that application - you've already set up all the admin settings when you packaged the app for deployment. The app might need some configuration after deployment - perhaps a data source setup, perhaps your app is only coded to support MySQL and SQL Server - so you build a simple admin that allows the purchaser of your packaged app to configure the app to talk to their existing MySQL or SQL Server database. > disable the ColdFusion administrator? You'd lose access to the log file > viewer, the ability to dump settings, etc. And these have what relevance to a packaged, deployed J2EE application? -- Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/ Breeze Me! -- http://www.corfield.org/breezeme Got Gmail? -- I have 50, yes 50, invites to give away! "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193736 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
